Posted at 08:13 AM in Current Affairs, More News, Public health, Toxics | Permalink | Comments (0)
What would you say if I told you that consumer product manufacturers are teaming up with local solid waste officials to eliminate the concept of “trash” altogether?
Does that sound like an eco-pipe dream?
Well, it’s not. Right here in Maine, electronics manufacturers have already set up and are financing collection and recycling programs for unwanted television sets, computers, monitors, cell phones, mercury-containing light bulbs and more.
The goal of these programs is to divert these products from landfills and incinerators and get them into recycling operations where they can be broken down and turned into new products.
While, Maine’s been on the cutting edge of this policy approach known as product stewardship (or extended producer responsibility) in the United States, we’re well behind places like the European Union and Canada, which are implementing stewardship plans to get pretty much everything you can think of out of the waste stream and into recycling operations.
And, here’s the kicker – it’s all done by private companies and the costs are incorporated into the price of the product, instead of left to taxpayers and local governments to figure out what to do with all the unwanted stuff.
Pretty soon, we won’t be talking about “solid waste” policy anymore. We’ll be talking about “sustainable materials” policy, and that, my friends, is a heck of a lot more exciting and truly has the potential to revolutionize the way we manufacture, use and dispose of consumer products. Rather than designing products for disposal, manufacturers will now have the incentives to design their products – and packaging – for their next uses, and will create the systems to capture those unwanted products and turn them into something new and valuable.
If all this sounds exciting to you, then you need to join us in Portland, Tuesday, August 17th for "The Product Stewardship State Legislative Forum: How Business and States are Turning Today’s Trash into Tomorrow’s Products.”
This free forum, taking place in conjunction with the Council of State Governments' Annual Eastern Regional Conference and sponsored by NRCM and the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, is an exciting opportunity to learn about how product stewardship is sweeping Maine and the nation and what it means for you, your business, local solid waste district, and our environment.
To register and learn more about agenda and the speakers for the event, please visit http://www.nrcm.org/product_stewardship_forum.asp.
Hope to see you there!
Matt Prindiville
NRCM Clean Production Project Director
Posted at 03:42 PM in E-waste, Event, Maine, NRCM, Public health, Toxics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Just as a follow-up to my post on recycling and municipal waste, check out the essay below by author, ecologist and cancer survivor Sandra Steingraber about the link between toxic waste, health and trash:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sandra-steingraber/the-hope-inside-canadas-g_b_586625.html
Sandra is an inspiring speaker and advocate. Maybe you got a chance to see her speak recently in Portland. If not, read her books Living Downstream and Having Faith.
- Mathew Scease
Posted at 02:30 PM in E-waste, Public health, Toxics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
NRCM just achieved a big legislative victory with passage of a sweeping, first-in-the-nation bill to collect and recycle light bulbs that contain mercury (compact fluorescent lights, or CFLs). Building off the success of Maine’s landmark electronic waste law, the new CFL bill directs light bulb manufacturers to share the costs and responsibility of recycling mercury-containing light bulbs. The bill’s passage will set a national precedent for other states to follow.
At one point during the legislative process, the bill appeared to be headed for a bitter partisan fight – with Democrats at the Natural Resources Committee supporting and Republicans opposed. That was not the outcome we were looking for, so we redoubled our efforts to talk with every Republican with the goal of building bi-partisan support.
That is when lobbyists representing the manufacturers expanded their ranks and pushed hard for a weakening amendment that would have completely gutted the bill and absolved manufacturers of all responsibility to collect the mercury. We worked with our friends in the retail community to get letters of opposition to the amendment. The manufacturers backed down off their amendment strategy, and focused instead on spreading false information about the bill – with the hope of delaying action until next year, so that “more studies” could be done. In other words: study the issue to death.
As the bill was about to head for a final vote, we knew it was make or break time, so we called in reinforcements: Sierra Fletcher from the Product Stewardship Institute, who co-chaired the national stakeholder group on mercury lamps recycling, and Michael Bender, from the Mercury Policy Project and chair of the Multi-state Mercury Campaign. Michael and Sierra drove up the morning before the committee vote, and we talked with swing committee members right up to the vote. We prepared documents the night before showing that the manufacturers have been pushing for delay and studies, studies and delay, around the country. “Anything but action,” has been their refrain.
The vote was taken, and we won with 12-1 vote out of committee, leading to a 130-13 victory in the house, and a near unanimous vote in the Senate.
We’re very excited about this victory. The Governor will hold a bill signing of the legislation next week – sending a clear message nationally - and globally - that a new day is dawning for total life cycle management and shared responsibility - from ‘the cradle to the grave’ for products containing mercury and other hazardous substances. This new law also sends a message to manufacturers that they need to assume their share of responsibility to reduce and wherever possible eliminate the toxicity of their products, and also to alleviate the increasing waste management cost burden on local governments.
We need to keep mercury and other hazardous materials in products out of the environment. This bill contributes to that goal.
NRCM appreciates the work of all the legislators who contributed to this victory, especially the bill’s sponsor, Representative Seth Berry from Bowdoinham, the lead co-sponsor, Senator Kevin Raye from Perry, and the two committee chairs, Representative Bob Duchesne and Senator Seth Goodall. They helped craft the final language that won overwhelming support in both Houses.
-Matt Prindiville, Toxics Project Director
Posted at 09:30 AM in E-waste, Energy efficiency, Mercury, NRCM, Public health, Toxics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
This comes to us from the Bangor Daily News in response to the terrible and misleading ad that the chemical corporations are now airing on TV to try and kill this important Deca toxic pollution ban. The chemical company lobby is the true special interest here... spending who knows what spreading false and misleading information all over the airwaves.
Meanwhile, Maine firefighters wholeheartedly endorse a ban on Deca, since safer, more effective flame retardants are readily available. Please watch our online flash video and forward to your friends so people can get the full story!
Industry ad ignites deca bill backers
By Kevin Miller
Tuesday, April 10, 2007 - Bangor Daily News
The political firefight over a chemical that helps keep televisions from bursting into flames has spread to — where else? — the television airwaves.
Several Maine television stations are airing advertisements, paid for by a chemical industry trade group, suggesting that bills under consideration in the state Legislature could put people and property at risk during a fire.
A legislative leader responded to the ad with some heat of her own...
Posted at 08:02 AM in Public health, Toxics | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)