« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »

December 2007

December 18, 2007

Behind the scenes at the Portland Plum Creek public hearing

I want to start this post by thanking everyone who came out to the public hearing in Portland on Saturday, and especially those who patiently waited hours for their three minutes of time.  Here is one blog post about the experience from the League of Young Voters http://theleagueofyoungvoters.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/reflections-on-moosehead-lake-by-felicia-teach/.  The media has been reporting that somewhere around 500 people came to the hearing.  I wish I had a more exact figure for you, but I was sitting up front doing my best to keep track of all the testimony and didn’t have a chance to do a head count.  I did have a few opportunities to stand up and look around, the room was full of people sporting the "Don’t Mess Up Moosehead" sticker that we were passing out.  It was clear to me that the vast majority of people in the room had come to show Plum Creek and the Commission that they were opposed to the development proposal.  There has been a lot of media over the past few days about the hearing so I won’t go into what has already been hashed and rehashed in the paper.  You can read the Portland Press Herald coverage here http://www.nrcm.org/news_detail.asp?news=2022.

What I’d prefer to tell you about is what hasn’t necessarily been reported...

Continue reading "Behind the scenes at the Portland Plum Creek public hearing" »

December 13, 2007

Final Greenville hearing postponed due to weather

The final Greenville public hearing about Plum Creek's massive development proposal for the Moosehead Lake region was originally scheduled for Sunday, December 16.  Due to a predicted snowstorm, the public hearing has now been postponed and will be held in Greenville on Saturday, January 19, 2008.  To learn more, please go to http://www.nrcm.org/pc_action.asp

We hope to see you in Portland for the public hearing on Saturday, December 15 - that one will go on as scheduled at the Holiday Inn By the Bay.  We will then see you in Greenville on January 19.  Thank you!

December 11, 2007

Questions about Plum Creek's proposal? Post them here.

Hey everyone let's get a dialogue going here.  If you have any questions about what is happening at the hearings or what is in the Plum Creek development proposal let us know and I’ll do my best to answer you here.

Diano Circo
North Woods Policy Advocate and Outreach Coordinator

Plum Creek hearings update - December 11

Today I had to give in to the need to get some office work done. While many of NRCM’s staff are hard at work at the intervener sessions I’m back at the office returning calls and planning for this weekends public hearings in Portland (Saturday, Holiday Inn By the Bay) and Greenville (Sunday, Greenville High School). I hope you all will take some time to come to the hearings. NRCM will be having an open house at each location where you can ask questions, pick up some food, and chat with NRCM staff. While at the office I’m continuing to follow the live action via the live web audio offered on the Land Use Regulation Commission website www.maine.gov/doc/lurc/webcast.html.

Over the past several days of testimony the proposed resorts at Lily Bay and Moose Mountain have drawn a lot of attention. NRCM has repeatedly pointed out that there is no certainty in Plum Creek’s proposal as to what a “resort” might actually look like. The proposal actually does not give any detail as to what the resorts my look like, it simply says that all sorts of uses would be allowed in the resort zone. The current resort zones would actually allow single family home subdivisions. We are concerned that the resorts will simply become gated communities and not true resorts. For example Plum Creek would only be required to have 15 transient accommodations at the Lily Bay resort. Many of Plum Creek’s supporters and witnesses have pointed to the potential resorts as the linchpin to the plan, yet it has been made clear in the past few days that there is no guarantee that a true resort will actually be built. Also of interest yesterday was hearing the attorney representing the Maine Professional Guides Association, Maine Snowmobile Association, ATV Maine, and Maine Bow Hunters Association attack the idea that the Moosehead region has wilderness.

NRCM’s tourism expert Costas Christ, who has worked all over the world, strongly stated that this region is the last remaining undeveloped forest east of the Mississippi and certainly meets the definition of wilderness. Costas went on to strongly encourage the Commission to require Plum Creek to include internationally recognized standards for sustainable resort development in their proposal. He highlighted some examples where resort developers have adopted these standards and also talked about places in the world where these standards have not been adopted and the local communities have been left to deal with poorly planed development. Costas also revealed that at one point Plum Creek had attempted to put him on retainer, but that he had decided not to accept that offer and instead thinks that what is being proposed to much too large and runs the risk of destroying what would attract people to the region.

-Diano Circo North Woods Policy Advocate and Outreach Coordinator

December 10, 2007

Plum Creek hearings update - the beginning of Week 2

I’m back at the St. Paul Center this morning for continued cross-examination of experts.  The intervener process will be continuing for the rest of this week and pick up again for a week in mid January.  As I’m typing NRCM’s attorney is cross-examining one of Plum Creek’s economic experts.  You’ll be happy to know that the flocks of lawyers have not thinned over the past week.  If you can believe it, it actually seems like the number has grown. In my experience spending time and working with people in Greenville a real concern has been what will happen to the families that currently live there if Plum Creek’s development proposal is successful.  Many have referenced what has happened on Maine ’s coast as an example of what they don’t want to happen in Greenville.  No one wants to see long time families forced to leave because of increased valuations and the taxes that come with it.

An interesting commentary from Will Neils, a witness from the Native Forest Network, on Friday touched on this issue.  While being questioned by one of the members of the Commission, Mr. Neils made some eloquent comments about the changes that he has seen in the Camden region as more affluent people have come to town.  Being born and raised in Appleton Mr. Neils testified that over his lifetime he had seen the taxes on his families property continue to climb as those who can’t afford to stay in Camden are forced inland to places like Appleton driving up costs.  He feared that what has been happening on the coast of Maine will come to Greenville.  Would long time residents of Greenville be forced away from Moosehead Lake and into towns like Shirley, Monson, and Dover-Foxcroft?  Mr. Neils thought that a true “plan” for the region could only be created by the people of the region through some kind of broad public process that included community members across the region. He went on to say that a process like this should be done by some kind of public body like the Land Use Regulation Commission and not a for-profit corporation like Plum Creek.

Continue reading "Plum Creek hearings update - the beginning of Week 2" »

December 07, 2007

Plum Creek hearings - news and information from Day 5

Hello again from the center of the Plum Creek universe. We’re on Day 5 of the intervener sessions. At the moment the Commissioners are asking questions of Joe Brenneman a County Commissioner from Flathead County Montana who has dealt directly with Plum Creek’s developments. Flathead County is currently being sued by Plum Creek over some development proposals.

Mr. Brenneman is encouraging the Commission to be very, very careful about determining what is going to be sustainable. In Montana Plum Creek’s interpretation of doing the right thing has been limited to what is required by law. He’s been told by Plum Creek officials if the County wants more they’ll have to get the law changed. Also this morning was cross examination of Plum Creek’s resort expert. He revealed that it is the proposed conservation easements that make the resort potential attractive. Without the easements the value of the resorts would be diminished.

Continue reading "Plum Creek hearings - news and information from Day 5" »

December 06, 2007

Plum Creek Hearings Continue...News from Day 4

Hello again, this time from the beginning of day 4 of the Plum Creek intervener sessions.  We’re just starting this morning and if it is anything like yesterday it should be interesting.

There was a lot of discussion yesterday about the locations of the development being proposed by Plum Creek.  NRCM and Maine Audubon made the point that Plum Creek owns land in the Town of Greenville.  None of the development in this proposal is actually in the Town of Greenville.  In cross-examination of Plum Creek’s Luke Muzzy the NRCM/Maine Audubon team was able to get Plum Creek to admit that the 8,000 acres they own in Greenville is developable. This raised the question of why development isn’t being proposed for Greenville but instead 12 miles from town in remote places like Lily Bay. 

Yesterday afternoon there was also a panel on economic impacts.  Cross-examination of one witness by the Native Forest Network revealed that Plum Creek’s own study showed that the majority of jobs from this proposal would be part-time, seasonal, low-wage jobs.

For more on what happened yesterday take a look at this story in the Bangor Daily News ( http://www.nrcm.org/news_detail.asp?news=1998) today.  Also for an interesting take from a sportsman’s perspective take a look at this editorial in the Bangor Daily News (http://www.nrcm.org/news_detail.asp?news=1996).

-Diano Circo, NRCM North Woods Policy Advocate and Outreach Coordinator

December 05, 2007

More from the Plum Creek hearings

As I’m sitting here for the beginning of the third day of intervener sessions, I thought I would write a quick post.  At the moment, the LURC commissioners are asking questions of Luke Muzzy of Plum Creek.  If there is one thing that has become clear after two full days of these sessions it’s that Plum Creek’s proposal is very complicated.  Several times even Luke has not been able to answer questions about how the proposal works.  A large focus of the second day was a discussion of why Plum Creek is seeking to lock in some of the rules for sensitive ecological areas for 30 years.  This would mean that if the State were to decide that protection zones that buffer streams or wetlands needed to be expanded in the future, those zones in Plum Creek’s proposed development zones would not change and those areas would not receive the protections.  Another area subject to a lot of debate was Plum Creek’s proposal to allow “view corridors” from all of their proposed lots.  This is something that no other land owner in LURC jurisdiction is allowed to do.  You can imagine how the experience from the water of Moosehead would change if every house lot was allowed to clear a “view corridor." More discussions on the layout and design of the proposed development will be happening today.

In case you haven’t seen it yet, take a look at Pat LaMarche’s editorial in today’s Bangor Daily News (http://www.nrcm.org/news_detail.asp?news=1990).  She asks some good questions about the affordable house being proposed by Plum Creek.  Would $150,000 houses actually be affordable for local residents?

-Diano Circo, NRCM North Woods Policy Advocate and Outreach Coordinator

December 03, 2007

The Plum Creek hearings begin...

Hey everyone.  At the moment I’m typing this from the audience of the first session of legal testimony before LURC.  These technical sessions are much like a court case in which each side is presenting testimony, experts and witnesses to the Commissioners who will ultimately make a decision.  The room is literally full of teams of attorneys.  One lawyer actually joked that there were more lawyers in this room than in all of Piscataquis and Somerset counties.  Opening statements by Plum Creek happened this morning and the intervening groups are presenting now.  NRCM is scheduled give its opening statements soon and is looking forward to countering Plum Creek’s legal team. 

I apologize for not posting sooner.  The last few days have been going at a furious pace.  The Greenville and Augusta public hearings went quite well.  To date more people have spoken in opposition to the proposal than in support, but we expect Plum Creek will respond to this and work very hard to get better turnout at the Portland (December 15th) and second Greenville (December 16th) public hearings.  We continue to need your support.  Please come to one of the remaining hearings.  The Bangor Daily News and Kennebec Journal both did a good job covering the hearings and you can find those links here: 

Continue reading "The Plum Creek hearings begin..." »