« NRCM board member Adam Lee Challenges Auto Industry | Main | How Walkable is Your House? »

June 15, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c58069e200e00980bf718833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Maine Wind Power Projects pick up steam:

Comments

I wonder why other areas suitable for this kind of renewable energy do not adopt the same technology. Time is wasting every day the world grows ever more dependent on fossil fuels and technologies that destroy the environment, act now.

Guy

This is very informative blog. The article is good for the reader and the comments as well. Thank you.

Rich raymond

Its about time !

Dylan Voorhees, NRCM clean energy project director

NRCM strongly supports land conservation in Maine’s North Woods, interior mountains, and areas with significant habitat values and remote resource haracteristics. The State of Maine is endowed with spectacular mountain resources and large tracts of forested habitat that warrant protection. NRCM also has a strong interest in the development of cleaner forms of electricity generation that will help reduce the environmental and public health harm caused by existing forms of power production. Given these two concerns, we have worked for over a year to identify and help design a compromise solution that makes sense for Maine.

In its comprehensive plan, the Land Use Regulatory Commission, LURC, is directed to “identify and protect high mountain resources with particularly high natural resource values or sensitivity which are not appropriate for most development.” As many groups made clear, Redington Pond Range meets the definition of a high mountain resource with “particularly high natural resource values.” NRCM agreed with that position, which is why we opposed the original application and worked to negotiate a Restriction Agreement for Redington Pond Range that would preclude wind power development on that mountain. By the same token, we believe that there is no compelling evidence that Black Nubble meets the test of being a high mountain resource with “particularly high natural resource values or sensitivity” that would warrant it being on a list for priority protection by LURC. You can read a more detailed analysis that leads to this conclusion in our testimony to LURC.

It might be useful to point out the implication of denying a permit to any wind project proposed near the Appalachian Trail. Black Nubble is about three miles from the trail at the closest point. If LURC were to make a de facto determination that this was too close, it would be the same as categorically ruling 1.5 million acres of Maine off limits for wind power, an area twice the size of Rhode Island. Given the need for Maine to increase its amount of clean, renewable power, this would be a huge step in the wrong direction, and not the kind of careful decision-making we expect from our government.

Jim

The bottom line is that the Black Nubble site is inappropriate for a wind farm. The facts overwhelmingly go against this project. In 2006 the developer himself did a good job stating why Black Nubble would not be economically feasible. This is now a case of Custer’s last stand for Harley Lee, his money and his pride. He chose this wilderness ridgeline site, arrogantly adjacent to the Appalachian Trail, many years ago, and at that time did not properly work with everyone to find a proper site for his wind farm.

Sara L

Re: Aug 23rd comment

Thank you for your comment about the need to support wind power in Maine, while recognizing that there are challenges to siting these projects. As with any new power generating source there will be some impacts from the project, but we believe the benefits of the clean power generated greatly outweigh these impacts. NRCM is a strong supporter of the Black Nubble Wind Project and is working to increase public support. This project will generate enough electricity to power approx 21,500 Maine homes, while also providing permanent protection from wind development on Redington Mountain. Thus, we believe it is a win-win situation for Maine. We encourage those who recognize the urgent need for clean power sources to share your voices with the Land Use Regulation Commission and your fellow citizens. You can find out more information about the Black Nubble Wind Project and our reasons for supporting it at: http://www.nrcm.org/black_nubble.asp

Ric Leo

At some point, NRCM, the MAC, and the AMC are going to have to realize that everyone is going to have to 'share the pain' in order to reverse the effects of global warming. I visit the Bigelow area frequently and love the area with all my heart but I know that even a little bit will help get the ball rolling, much as an avalance first starts with a few small flakes of snow. Is there something irreplacable about Black Nubble that cannot be found elsewhere along the AT? Which is more harmful to the peaks, the effect on the view or the acid rain falling from Midwestern coal-burners? There are lots of battles to fight to preserve as much of the Wilderness as we can, but this isn't one of them.

Dylan Voorhees, NRCM Clean Energy Director

NRCM believes that wind power can and must play a meaningful role in the urgent need to reduce global warming pollution from Maine and the region. About one third of our global warming pollution comes from power plants. And every kilowatt-hour of energy produced from wind power reduces generation at another power plant—in most cases, a fossil-fuel burning plant. We support a goal of obtaining 5% of our electricity from wind power by 2010 and 10% by 2020. Both will be significant amounts of clean power.

We also believe that many mountains and ridges are not suitable for wind power, precisely because these projects do have impacts and are incompatible with some ecological and remote, scenic resources. Both the Black Nubble and Kibby mountain projects have significant land mitigation components that will result in the permanent protection of hundreds of acres of high-value, high-elevation land. As a member of the Governor’s Wind Power Task Force, we will be working to help improve guidance for appropriate locations for wind.

Unfortunately there are many threats to the North Woods and wilderness of Maine. One of those is excessive development; which NRCM opposes actively. Another is pollution from fossil-power plants, leading to dangerous acid rain and mercury levels. Global warming itself threatens to devastate the North Woods of Maine, driving out rare species and the spruce-fir forest itself.

Energy efficiency and conservation efforts are at least as important as wind power in reducing our global warming pollution, although we unquestionably need both. That is why our energy project devotes considerable effort to increasing efficiency investments in the state. For example, for over a year we worked to shape and win passage for LD 1851 which authorized the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and more than doubles funding for efficiency programs in Maine. NRCM also developed the Maine Global Warming Challenge and encourages everyone in Maine to take it. www.globalwarmingmaine.org.

Efficiency, clean renewables like wind, cleaner cars, and alternative transportation - these are all components of a strategy for reducing the environmental impacts of our energy use. Individually, none will solve the problem. Single compact florescent light bulbs and hybrids make only a small difference, but together their impact is large. The same is true for wind power, though projects like Black Nubble, Kibby and Stetson will do the equivalent of more than 20 million light bulbs.

Jim Hutzler

Dear NRCM:

How many ridgelines do you want to sacrifice for electricity generation? I hope that everyone understands that these projects are not benign, and will do little or nothing to mitigate global warming. Why are you not loudly promoting CONSERVATION? Is it because you are in bed with Harley Lee, Republican hack Rep. Darrell Issa and his client Edison Mission Energy of California (a horrible coal power plant operator), partners in the Redington Black Nubble tragedy? Huge money is at stake here, and our wilderness is at risk of being decimated for the sake of greed. Please, folks, learn all the facts before all is lost!

Sara

Hi, this is Sara with NRCM, outreach coordinator for our clean energy project. First of all,

Thank you for your interest in wind power and your comments. NRCM is a strong supporter of appropriately-sited wind projects such as those discussed in this blog posting. A shift to cleaner energy sources like wind is necessary to address global warming and also to reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources. We undoubtedly have a long way to go before we achieve the wind capacity of countries like Spain, who got 27% of their electricity from wind on March 20th, more than from nuclear or coal plants! Spain is the second largest producer of wind energy behind Germany.

Some folks have questioned whether Maine is generating this power just to send it elsewhere. It is true that Maine is exporting some of the electricity generated by wind to Canada or other states in New England (we are part of a regional grid). Either way, we may be displacing other more polluting sources of energy or keeping new fossil-fuel fired plants from being built. This is good for Maine and the rest of the world!

You can now offset the carbon emissions from your electricity use and car/air travel with a MAINE-MADE product by purchasing Maine Wind Watts from the Mars Hill Wind Farm. You can purchase them at: http://www.meipl.org/Pages/Products/Certificates_upc.html


Thanks for sharing your comments, and keep them coming!

Dave Litchfield

For the first article, you might have chosen your title words more carefully---"picks up Steam"??? These windmill farms are not the cure for the total energy problem, but if the electricity is dispursed as implied, it should make a dent in the oil imports--however, there has to be a lot of them, and they have to be hooked to the ground somewhere. Stop fighting every location!!

Gary Mclaughlin

Question ? will all the power being produced by these wind mills benefit the maine people or will it be sent out of state or to canada.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.